Prior Community Meetings
General Q&A
Below are questions and comments received at our public meetings that we have taken the time to respond to for the benefit of all community residents.
How is the plan adhering to EPA guidelines?
We will be fully compliant with EPA and municipal guidelines.
Will you be under construction 24/7, 365 days per year?
No. Our construction times would occur only between the hours of 8 am – 8 pm, and while we would be permitted to operate seven (7) days per week, we will likely only operate Monday-Friday.
During construction, will you be blasting all day long?
We will utilize multiple techniques to limit impacts to surrounding structures. These are carefully controlled, subsurface procedures that would likely occur no more than once per day and that will not be seen, heard or felt from the surface during the course of construction.
Are you building under other properties?
No, we will only build under our property with a significant safety buffer from neighboring property lines.
Won’t construction traffic burden the roads, rail and river?
There will be marginal increases in construction traffic during the course of the build out. Surface route traffic will be largely contained due to dedicated service routes designed to minimize local impact. Upon completion, the majority (~80%) of the surface traffic will be the result of employee traffic (passenger vehicles).
How do you plan on making the air quality better?
We believe that development can bring economic opportunity while supporting a healthy, sustainable environment. We’ve made it a goal of ours to help improve air quality in the surrounding community through the addition of over 700 trees, substantial ecological restoration, new native landscaping, incorporating outdoor air filtration technology, electrification of construction equipment, and by encouraging electric vehicle adoption through a proposed EV charging station.
All the new recreational space looks great. Are we going to have to wait until the end of the project to get those community amenities?
Of course not! Our current timeline expects that community benefits, such as the new park space and community solar, will be built during the first phase of construction – likely within the first 2-3 years.
Isn’t it a lot more expensive to build below ground? Why not build for less money on the surface?
Actually, building above ground would not be much cheaper or faster. Subsurface construction is a much more effective use for the site given the past heavy industrial use that resulted in significant remediation challenges that would be far too expensive to rehabilitate. By siting The Invert below ground, we are able to construct a creative, sustainable, modern economic engine in the community. Locating the facility below ground also offers reduced energy costs to the facility and re-purposes a large portion of the surface to be a community solar field. Furthermore, the subsurface facility allows us to add new plant & wildlife areas to the surface while preserving a permeable surface to capture captures rainfall and reduce the impact on local water and sewer infrastructure.
Questions from 2021 are listed below:
---
Kansas City: Is there any feedback of their experiences during their project that can be shared to settle any fears the community might be considering?
The innovative subsurface design of The Invert has understandably generated several questions during our community engagement meetings. In fact, when we visited two of the subsurface complexes in Kansas City, we asked many of the same questions being raised by neighbors here on the southeast side. As a result, we’ve commissioned a variety of expert engineering firms to provide a thorough understanding of any potential impacts of the project, both during construction and operation. The studies are expected to be completed and made public later this summer.
2023 start? Is this projected or actual? When is Invert planning on presenting all of this to start the permits?
Yes, we have not yet filed an application with the city of Chicago, so the start date is a projection. We do, however, anticipate beginning preliminary construction in 2023 after the permit process begins.
So with Ozinga Ventures, you are funded, but does that carry through to the 2026 to 2030 mark?
Our initial funding is indeed from Ozinga Ventures. Projects like this typically are funded in multiple rounds by various investors. Beyond our initial funding, we have received strong interest in our proposal, and anticipate adding investors as we progress through the entitlement process. The Invert’s sustainability, low carbon footprint, alternative energy and social equity aspects are also attractive to a growing category of investors.
What are the challenges of leasing and will some KC businesses follow to help you hit that 12 to 15yr mark?
The energy savings and innovative nature of The Invert’s subsurface space will certainly attract many types of tenants to the Chicago market. It has proven to be a highly successful business model in Kansas City. Naturally, tenants who have already experienced the benefits of operating subsurface will likely be among the first to consider this type of space in Chicago.
I'm not sure I feel comfortable with a brand new mine a couple of blocks away from my home.
We receive many questions from people who misunderstand The Invert’s goal. To be clear, our interest in building subsurface is to create a unique, environmentally sustainable, and highly energy efficient space for tenants whose business would most benefit. These include vertical farming, cloud computing, cold and food storage, green manufacturing, and more who will create thousands of modern-economy, well-paying jobs and generate a strong local economy. If we were simply interested in obtaining the below-grade materials, there are many significantly less costly, less complicated and less time-consuming ways to go about that process. Also, there are misconceptions about the impact that The Invert's construction will have on the surrounding community. We have designed the construction process to ensure that nothing is heard or felt on the surface.
How much are you going to be requesting in government funding?
We will not seek Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds for the private operations of the site; however, we will ultimately seek TIF funding to extend Burley Avenue. The extension of Burley Avenue will benefit the community by redirecting much of the current truck traffic from local streets to Burley Avenue. We don’t yet have an estimated cost for that portion of the project.
What benefit are you promising community residents that will make the project worth it to us?
During our community engagement meetings, hundreds of residents have told us they desire new economy, clean, well-paying jobs close to home. We’re committed to providing those opportunities and to doing so in the most sustainable, environmentally responsible manner possible. With public health in mind, we’ve hired national and global experts to ensure we meet that standard. When economic opportunity is increased, health outcomes, healthier families and healthier communities will follow. We are absolutely committed to community benefits and look forward to continuing our discussions with the community to determine those ideas most desired by the neighborhood.
Why do you need to dig underground when we have the open land to build the same facilities above ground? NWI is doing above ground development at what is likely a fraction of the cost and time you are proposing.
Actually, building above ground would not be much cheaper or faster and would in fact be cost-prohibitive once you account for traditional remediation costs. This is why so many properties remain abandoned and undeveloped on the southeast side. The value of our proposal is that it is a creative and economically viable solution to brownfield redevelopment that would create a one-of-a-kind subsurface space. For the environment, building subsurface eliminates the need for many tons of construction materials and the trucks needed to deliver them to an above surface construction site. Being subsurface avoids the need for a 6 million square foot roof and the subsequent urban runoff after a rainstorm. The Invert would be Chicago’s largest green roof. Building subsurface also offers constant temperatures and humidity and save tenants up to 75% in utility costs for heating and cooling compared to surface facilities. Furthermore, surface development of this site would require cost-prohibitive demolition and surface remediation. Traditional remediation would also put 100s of additional trucks on the road. In addition, the majority of the surface cannot be accessed safely and efficiently due to an active freight railroad line. Subsurface also adds a level of security not found above ground. And surface development would produce only one-tenth the number of jobs and economic impact of our subsurface plan. The Southeast Side is uniquely situated for a modern, industrial real estate development like The Invert– both from a multi-modal transportation perspective, as well as available workforce. Why let those associated jobs continue to go to Indiana? We think they should stay right here in the 10th Ward.
Who will be receiving the minerals and limestone extracted from the development? Is it directly sold for profit or is the revenue strictly used to pay for the development costs?
A qualified contractor will remove the below-grade materials. The Invert will not be involved in the marketing or sale of these materials.
Has The Invert been approved yet?
We have not applied for a permit to the City of Chicago. We’ve chosen to first gather community input and have been doing so since January 2021. We’ve met with hundreds of residents, hosted dozens of conversations, held our first community-wide webinar and continue to meet with individuals and organizations on a weekly basis. If you are interested in scheduling a meeting, please contact us directly via email at LilianaRivera@TheInvertChicago.com and our development team would be pleased to assist you further.
Aren’t you proposing to rebuild Burley Avenue for the benefit of your logistical operations at taxpayer expense?
The Chicago Department of Transportation, with the help of the State of Illinois, has already approved and funded a plan to improve Burley Avenue from 126th Place to 106th Street. This work will be done regardless of our participation and has already been funded. The improvement of Burley Avenue would benefit the community by rerouting commercial truck traffic from residential streets such as Avenue O.
Is the contaminated soil on the site being removed?
The project is designed to mitigate any need to disturb the above-ground surface, with only below-grade materials being removed from the site. We will begin by enhancing the amount of grass, plants and trees as guided by the Calumet Landscaping Design Guide. First, 10-foot-high by 60-foot-wide landscaped berms will be built on the east side of the site. The surrounding community will see a significantly greener and more tree-laden site upon completion of the construction.
Aren’t you just in it for the big profits?
We’re hoping to generate a reasonable return on the significant investment that will be required to build The Invert. However, Chicago is our home, and we agree with many of the residents’ desire for economic opportunity here on the Southeast Side of Chicago. We think there is plenty of opportunity here for residents of the 10th Ward and for The Invert.
Limestone deposits are found many places in the Midwest. Let other communities step up and offer their neighborhoods up. Lots of suburbs could be hosting one, but you don’t see that happening, do you?
Yes, limestone deposits are indeed common in the Midwest. In fact, there are currently 13 suburban Chicago locations actively supplying material. This is exactly why The Invert is not interested in the value of the materials being removed to create the subsurface space. Simply put, the supply and demand don’t make sense.
You asked what I would like to see - job training centers for the trades, 21st century schools with science and technology labs, art studios, music rooms, state of the art technology, a sufficient number of classrooms and enrichment programs. Investment in our parks, a community center in each neighborhood, little league fields away from polluting industries, new streetscapes for our business districts, investment into the community from existing industry.
We agree, in addition to providing good paying jobs, industry should have a significantly positive impact on the community. That’s why we’re asking people from the neighborhood for input on the ways that The Invert can do just that. The responses include many of the amenities you describe. We intend to include many of these ideas into our final proposal.